And just one woman author was named. Not cool.
http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/aer.101.1.1
Can we come up with a list of the 20 Best Heterodox Economics papers in the past hundred years?
(I think my list will start off with maybe Marglin... Sabel and Zeitlin?.... what else? I guess some of the best econ papers don't even necessarily need to be written by economists)
http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/aer.101.1.1
Can we come up with a list of the 20 Best Heterodox Economics papers in the past hundred years?
(I think my list will start off with maybe Marglin... Sabel and Zeitlin?.... what else? I guess some of the best econ papers don't even necessarily need to be written by economists)
Just because one woman was included does not mean there is something sexist about it. Perhaps nobody published a paper that was worth naming. You do realize that everything that men do is NOT sexist.
ReplyDelete